Jason Turkish, the fiancé of Rep. Haley Stevens (D-Mich.), said in an interview published Wednesday that he would support Republican Senate candidate Mike Rogers over Abdul El-Sayed, who previously ran against Stevens in the Democratic primary for Michigan’s Senate race. Turkish also accused El-Sayed of using antisemitic language on the campaign trail, according to the interview.
The comments, reported in an interview published Wednesday, mark an unusual public split between a member of Congress and a close family member who is declaring a preference for the opposing party’s candidate. Turkish’s allegation that El-Sayed used antisemitic language is framed in the interview as a reason for his decision to back Rogers; the claim is presented as Turkish’s view rather than an established finding.
Stevens is identified in the interview as the congresswoman whose fiancé made the statement; El-Sayed is described as Stevens’s former Democratic primary rival in Michigan’s Senate contest, and Mike Rogers as the Republican candidate Turkish says he would support. The supplied material attributes the accusation about antisemitic language to Turkish only and does not establish the accuracy of the allegation.
Bombing near Colombia–Venezuela bridge raises tensions in Cúcuta after official’s killing
Stevens’s fiance will back Rogers rather than El‑Sayed, he says
Public endorsements — and the withdrawal or cross-party backing of high-profile allies and family members — can alter the tone of a campaign, particularly in a competitive Senate race. In this case, Turkish’s comments may draw attention because they come from someone closely connected to a sitting Democratic member of Congress. The supplied account does not include responses from Stevens, El-Sayed or Rogers, and the accusation remains an allegation in the supplied reporting.
The interview quoted in the supplied material did not include documentation or third-party confirmation of the alleged antisemitic language attributed to El-Sayed. Because the statement is an accusation reported as part of Turkish’s remarks, it should be understood as his characterization of El-Sayed’s conduct on the trail rather than an independently verified finding.
Beyond the immediate claim and Turkish’s stated preference for Rogers, the supplied material does not provide additional detail about timing, specific remarks alleged to be antisemitic, or any subsequent reactions from the campaigns involved. The matter appears within the broader context of the Michigan Senate race, where intra-party competition and cross-party dynamics are part of the unfolding political landscape.
Readers seeking further detail should look for the full interview and statements from the campaigns and campaign spokespeople for verification and fuller context. The supplied excerpt presents Turkish’s position and allegation but does not contain corroboration or an on-the-record response from the named candidates.
